Tuesday, May 24, 2016

The 2016 Bryant Park Summer Movie Festival Lineup!

One of the best annual events in New York City is the Bryant Park Summer Movie Festival held at dusk in the lovely park behind the New York Public Library.
Where else can you gather with thousands of New Yorkers and watch some of the best movies under the stars?
Sure the fights over blanket-space, the frequent sssssh-ing, and spilled Chardonnay can be annoying- but nothing tops one of those cinematic moments when the whole lawn stops and watches in awe.

Here are my thoughts on the films for this year's festival:

June 20- Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986)
Probably one of the seminal movies of the '80's. Expect a lawn-wide "Danke Schoen" serenade and a "Twist and Shout" riot.

June 27- East of Eden (1955)
Weird choice. The movie is very long- and loses some of the brilliance of the book. But it's James Dean. Who wouldn't want to lay on a blanket with him?



July 4- Top Gun (1986)
Another seminal movie of the '80's. Expect a lawn-wide "You've Lost That Loving Feeling" serenade. Frequent snickers at the gay subtext can also be expected.

July 11- The Palm Beach Story (1942)
One of my favorite comedies. Read more about it here. There's some overt racism that might get booed.

July 18- The Omen (1976)
Personally, I prefer Damien: Omen II (1978), but there's plenty of weird deaths in this first one to keep you laughing/cringing. Satanic nannies, devil-dogs, and fun with lightning rods. It's all for you...

July 25- Three Days of the Condor (1975)
The opening of this movie haunted my childhood. In an era where workplace shootings are commonplace, it's best to always be late for work.

August 1- Harvey (1950)
It's like the film curators have been reading my blog...

August 8- High Plains Drifter (1973)
I often get my Clint Eastwood '70's westerns confused- but whichever one this is, expect shooting, sneering, and those always wonderful Eastwood one-liners.


August 15- The Big Chill (1983)
I've never sat through this one. Maybe I need to be at Bryant Park this night...

August 22- Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
This is my favorite Star Trek movie. It is sci-fi fun from stem to stern- and actually has the most poignant moments in the whole franchise. The crowd-backed cry of "Khaaaaaaannnnnnn!!!" will be heard for miles.



So grab a blanket and a picnic basket (with cleverly concealed wine) and head to Bryant Park this summer!

Friday, May 20, 2016

Jimmy, Jimmy, Oh, Jimmy, Jimmy!

H-h-h-h-he is one of the most recognizable stars of Classic Hollywood. With his boyish charm and humble stutter, James Stewart personified the thoughtful, passionate everyman in a career that spanned over fifty years. Born in Indiana, Pennsylvania, Stewart started his entertainment career in college and then went to Broadway. By the mid-Thirties he was making movies in Hollywood and was a bankable star by the end of the decade.

When America went to war, Stewart was drafted- but was found to be underweight. Rather than shrugging his bony shoulders and going back to the safety of a Hollywood soundstage, he kept re-applying (and eating) until he was accepted in the Air Corps, turning down a behind-the-lines instructor position to fly actual combat missions.
His return to Hollywood in Frank Capra's It's a Wonderful Life (1946) not only created an iconic film role, but signaled a more complex Stewart that reflected Post-War America. He would work with some of the masters of Fifties cinema: Hitchcock, Preminger, Mann, Ford. As he aged, Stewart continued to perform and remained immensely popular, earning a total of five Academy Awards and an Honorary Oscar in 1985.

Stewart was a star- but after an early reputation as a playboy, managed to avoid the kinds of scandal and rumor that attracted the likes of Hedda Hopper and Louella Parson (unless you consider the fact that he was a proud card-carrying Hollywood Republican scandalous). He was known as a consummate professional and an all-around swell fella. The lovable screen persona of Jimmy Stewart became the public image- and it has endured.

On what would have been his 108th birthday here are my Top 5 Jimmy Stewart Movies:

You Can't Take It With You (1938)

Director Frank Capra was on a roll with two Best Director Oscars for It Happened One Night (1934) and Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936) so the expectations for his film adaptation of Kaufman and Hart's Broadway hit You Can't Take it With You were high. Capra cast Stewart as Tony Kirby, the lovestruck son of a banker who has to re-examine his political beliefs when he falls for a gal (wise-crackin' Jean Arthur) from a kooky liberal family.

With a family of hams like Lionel Barrymore, Spring Byington, and Ann Miller, who wouldn't do a spit-take over Sunday dinner? The film hops between goofy family comedy and earnest political statement, so there are moments when Capra's social preachiness weighs-down the narrative. But Stewart was perfect as a young man addled by love and an eccentric family, finally succumbing to the charms of both.

The success of You Can't cemented Stewart's endearing stammer and open-mouthed "aw shucks" face in popular culture and became his first big hit. It also started a professional relationship with Frank Capra that would result in legendary films Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) and It's a Wonderful Life (1946). Not to mention Capra earned his third and final Best Director statue. It seems in this case, you can definitely take it with you.

Destry Rides Again (1939)

Stewart's first Western in a career riddled with them is a real charmer. The town of Bottleneck is run by crooked mayor Hiram J. Slade who has just had his henchman dispatch the town sheriff. Enter son of a famous lawman Tom Destry, Jr. (Stewart) who without a gun, begins to clean up this one-horse town. Standing in his way is saloon chanteuse Frenchy (the not French- but who cares? Marlene Dietrich) who winds up falling for the lanky sharpshooter who ultimately has to whip out his pistol to break the bad guys.

Dietrich gives a career-defining performance, playing a world-weary gal who knows her way around a bar and a man. Her warbling of "See What the Boys in the Backroom Will Have" inspired Madeline Kahn's hilarious Lili Von Schtupp in Mel Brooks' classic Western parody Blazing Saddles (1974). And Dietrich's catfight with Una Merkel is a hair-pulling, glass-throwing, chair-breaking masterpiece that caused a ruckus with the censors.

Dietrich and Stewart are absolute magic together- a sort of odd couple with the seductive singer and the reluctant gunman throwing off sparks. Apparently they hit it off offscreen as well. In later years, Dietrich claimed she got pregnant during the affair but got rid of lil' Jimmy without telling the father. This did not prevent her from starring with Stewart years later in airplane drama No Highway in the Sky (1951) where Dietrich takes full advantage of the fact that you could still smoke on planes.

See what the boys in the backroom will have- Emphysema.

The Philadelphia Story (1940)

Is there such a thing as the perfect movie? I would venture to say there is- and this is one of them. George Cukor's romantic comedy about a society wedding was based on a successful Broadway play and had top star wattage. The great Kate Hepburn played uppercrust gal Tracy Lord (no not that Traci Lords) whose wedding to another uppercrust soul (John Howard staying out of the way of the rest of the stellar cast) is complicated when her ex-husband C.K. Dexter Haven (oh so handsome Cary Grant) shows up, along with a pair of newspaper reporters (Stewart and his gal Friday Ruth Hussey), and Tracy's philandering father (John Halliday).

Of course there are mix-ups and romantic entanglements, witty barbs, and enough cocktails to fill a backyard pool. It's one of those movies where you wish you could jump through the screen and tie one on at a garden party with these fascinating folk.

Stewart as disillusioned poet turned newshound plays against his famous image by being cynical and snide- mocking Tracy and her whims and fancies. But once he gets drunk, he gives in to his true feelings and gushes about his awe of her "magnificence." Here is the Stewart we know- the young man spilling out his heart to beat the band grabbing all of our heart strings in his thin hand. Macaulay Connor for this one shining moment becomes Jefferson Smith, giving a filibuster on love. It's a wonderful performance that earned him his only competitive Oscar. And as a member of this mostly Oscar nominated cast (someone was smoking crack and left Grant off the nomination list that year), he helped make one of the great romantic comedies of the Golden Era.


Harvey (1950)

Elwood P. Dowd has troubles. His live-in sister and niece are angry with him because his best friend Harvey is causing a stir. Why shouldn't he? He's an imaginary 6" tall rabbit. Based on the Pulitzer Prize-winning Mary Chase play (they used to make a lot of movies out of plays) Harvey was a pet project for Stewart. He had played Elwood on Broadway, and hoped to bring the success he had on stage to the screen. Spoiler alert: He did.

Stewart was at the peak of his genial abilities, making this lost alcoholic who saw the world differently irresistable. Most of the characters in the play believe Elwood is crazy, in fact they want him committed. But for the play to work, we have to believe that Elwood sees Harvey. We can't think he's crazy. And even though we don't see the hulking lepus, we want to. Stewart's innate ability to make us trust and love him achieves those aims, seemingly effortlessly. He would earn his fourth Academy Award nomination for it. 


Harvey is one of those showcase movies built around one star's performance that can feel like an ego-trip. But the supporting cast that includes Oscar winner Josephine Hull joins in the heavy-lifting with Stewart and delivers a picture that works even when Stewart (and Harvey) are offscreen. 

Rear Window (1954)

Before you Hitchcock fans get too up in arms, yes I chose Rear Window over Vertigo (1958) for my favorite Stewart/Hitchcock movie. Vertigo might be a better work of art- but I think Rear Window is a better movie.
Stewart plays photographer Jeff Jeffries who is laid-up in his New York apartment with a broken leg. Unable to get around he sits in his wheelchair and tunes in to a common New York City show- the neighbors. Jeff's apartment looks out onto a back courtyard that is ringed by the rears of multiple buildings, providing a view into the lives of all of his neighbors- or at least those that don't lower their shades. As we watch The Songwriter, Miss Torso, Miss Lonelyhearts, a pair of newlyweds, and Miss Hearing Aid, we become part of a community that doesn't know it's a community.

Jeff is the director linking all of these strangers' lives. When neighbor Lars Thorwald (a creep-a-rific Raymond Burr) begins acting very strangely, Jeff worries that a murder has occurred and uses his girlfriend Lisa (the oh-so posh Grace Kelly) to investigate.

Stewart's trustworthiness is again at the center of his performance. We have to believe that Jeff witnessed a murder- even if we don't see it. We must have faith something happened- even if other characters are reluctant to accept it. With Stewart, that belief comes unconditionally, so that even when doubts creep in, we know that ultimately he will be vindicated. It's watching how the proof is revealed that makes it so much fun.

Hitchcock's brilliant camerawork uses long takes and subtle POV shots to lure us into Jeff's voyeuristic world and link together all of the different characters. The camera rarely leaves Jeff's apartment, opting for long shots that immerse the audience in Jeff's immobile view, making us meta viewers of a viewer.

This "viewed from a distance" technique produces a feeling of helplessness- much how Stewart feels when watching Lisa in danger from the confines of his apartment. Instead of a simple gimmick, Hitchcock's use of the camera allows us to be part of the film- and that ups the thrill level as the mystery unfolds.

Oh and Thelma Ritter appears as a sassy visiting nurse. Who wouldn't want that rubdown?

If all that's not enough to prove how charming Jimmy is, watch him tell a joke.

Monday, May 9, 2016

Looking for Mr. Goodbar -or- Slut-Shaming Seventies Style

I have been waiting to see Looking for Mr. Goodbar (1977) for awhile. It's cult status emanates from a tantalizing mixture of dangerous sexual content, Seventies styling, and unavailability on DVD or on the various streaming services. Goodbar is like a forbidden, naughty confection that you just have to taste. So when BAM announced it was including it in its Labor of Love: 100 Years of Movie Dates film series, I grabbed a couple friends and high-tailed it out to Brooklyn to finally get a bite of Goodbar. I wound up with a bitter mouthful of unsweetened Baker's chocolate.


Goodbar is loosely based on the best-selling Judith Rossner novel of the same name that was based on a notorious 1973 New York murder case. I use the term "loosely" because director Richard Brooks' screen adaptation departs from the actual crime story- and according to Roger Ebert's 1977 film review, from the book as well.

Theresa (Diane Keaton who in the same year won an Oscar for Annie Hall) is a school teacher who during the day teaches deaf kids to speak; and at night gets high and trolls bars for men to get bizzy wit'. This film (and probably the novel) revels in the taboo nature of the hedonistic woman- a woman who goes after the pleasures in life with little regard for the cultural goals of coupledom and family. I am all for this. And in parts of this movie, Goodbar seems to be saying that equality for women includes them being able to enjoy an active sexual life just like swinging bachelors do.

Theresa starts off having an affair with her philandering professor, but after he unceremoniously dumps her, she picks herself up and finds independence by getting a job, getting her own apartment, and exploring the freedom of going out and having a good time.

Keaton's screen persona insures that Theresa does not come off as a licentious vixen. Her innate intelligence and wit makes Theresa a manage-ably damaged woman who chooses to enjoy herself and at the same time work hard to educate and empower underserved children. Keaton's Theresa says you don't have to choose between the whore and the Madonna. A real woman can be both- and there's nothing wrong with that. But then there is.

I could say spoiler alert here- but honestly, knowing that the film is based on a real-life murder case, it's hard to avoid the fact that Theresa doesn't make it to the end credits. She comes close, but the final disturbing murder scene shot in the flicker of a strobe light catching glimpses of Theresa's dying face ends her foray into free love. Before that abrupt moment, there are other scenes in the film where Theresa gets into trouble for hooking up with the wrong man- hell, even the "normal" guy she goes out with turns out to have some major stalker issues. There is no room in this film for Theresa to be fulfilled by a lifestyle that men routinely take part in without consequences. And the way it's presented, it feels like Brooks is okay with that.

Theresa's sister Katherine (played by Marilyn-toned Oscar nominee Tuesday Weld) has an abortion, swinger parties with her husband, and multiple divorces, but  she doesn't wind up brutally murdered. She gets a killer fur coat and a townhouse. So is it okay to act like a hedonist as long as you get married? The night of her murder (New Year's Eve) Theresa makes the resolution that this will be the final night of her carousing, but she receives the ultimate punishment just the same. Is Brooks telling us this story as a cautionary tale like alot of the press at the time of the murder did. Or are we supposed to feel that Theresa is robbed of a free and equal life not just by the murderer, but by the male-dominated culture itself? This film is tied to the true story's ending, so perhaps no matter how Brooks wanted to approach the topic, the punitive feeling of the final scene was unavoidable.

There's one other troublesome issue with this film. Gary, the murderer, (played by a young and ripped Tom Berenger) is a gay man who earlier in the evening left his older lover because he was tired of being treated like a pansy. When Theresa kids him about not being able to "get it up", he flies into a rage and stabs her to death. In real-life, the murderer was not a gay man. I don't know what Rossner did with the character in the book, but Brooks' treatment of him seems shoe-horned in and feels like it is taking advantage of the risible "gay man as dangerous sexual psycho" sensationalist stereotype in Seventies cinema. It's an unfortunate depiction from the man who brought Cat On a Hot Tin Roof's Brick Pollitt to the big screen in 1958.

None of my friends that I saw Goodbar with enjoyed the experience. One woman in front of the crowded theater jumped up applauding at the the end and then howled out to the audience, "Why aren't you clapping?!!" The movie doesn't seem to know whether it's a romantic drama, comedy (Theresa's R-rated Walter Mitty-esque fantasies seem particularly out of place), or thriller- its genre as confused as its setting. (Is it New York? Chicago? San Francisco? Purposefully ambiguous so that it becomes a universal warning?) Several events in the screenplay like a trip to a gay bar and the gifting of a strobe light feel like they are only used to justify a plot point (or a lighting effect) later on- not part of a fluid narrative. And the final icky impression of punishment for the sexually liberated woman stuck to us like melted chocolate.

But there are some fantastic visuals from Oscar-nominated cinematographer William A. Fraker, and the sight of a young Richard Gere doing push-ups in a jockstrap is certainly worth the price of admission. Just be prepared for a movie that might leave a bad taste in your mouth.


Friday, May 6, 2016

The Insanity of Roman Polanski

Let me start off by saying if you are hoping for a blog post about Roman Polanski's personal life, I will be a huge disappointment to you. I apologize ahead of time, and assure you it is not the first time I have disappointed someone... ask some of my exes.

What I want to talk about instead is Polanski's cinematic triptych about decaying sanity called his "Apartment Trilogy": Repulsion (1965), Rosemary's Baby (1968), and The Tenant (1976). Although made a little over ten years apart, and based on different source material, these three movies have very similar elements that make watching them together a trip down a bizarre rabbit hole of Polanski's twisted design.

Let's start with Repulsion. This dark little number was Polanski's first English-language, full-length film. Set in London, it follows young manicurist Carol (a luminous Catherine Deneuve) who has a case of man trouble. The trouble is, she doesn't want them around. She blows off (not literally) a date and is grossed-out by her sister's boyfriend's razor being left in her toothbrush glass.

When the noise of her sister screwing wafts through the wall of her bedroom, it's all she can do to keep from pounding on it and telling her to knock it off. So when her sister takes a vacation to the leaning Tower of Pisa, you would think it is a good opportunity for Carol to get some alone time. The problem is, Carol's not alone.

Carol hears noises outside her bedroom door, and the walls start to crack. Soon men are appearing in her room, raping her. She can no longer concentrate at work, mutilating rich, white cuticles as she stares into space.
Polanski films these episodes so that we know Carol is hallucinating- but it is so skillfully done that we can't help but join Carol in her first-person madness. The problem intensifies when real men show up in the apartment and Carol is assaulted. The imagined men are joined by the corpses of real ones.

Polanski uses Carol's homespace as a representation of Carol's headspace. The claustrophobia of the apartment mirrors Carol's stifling fears of men. The gaping cracks in the wall are cracks in reality. The decaying food a symbol of the rotting away of Carol's mind.
What is so interesting about Repulsion is that the focus is less about explaining why Carol goes off the tracks, and more about the visualization of madness- the creating of an atmosphere that makes us experience Carol's downward spiral rather than explain it. The film closes with a close-up of a picture of Carol as a child creepily standing out from a family portrait. Apparently she was just born that way.

Repulsion was a very successful independent import, and it turned out to be an excellent dry-run for Polanski's first high-profile Hollywood project, the controversial Rosemary's Baby. Based on the popular Ira Levin best-seller, Rosemary is the story of young New York City newlyweds Guy (John Cassavetes married to Gena Rowlands at the time) and Rosemary (Mia Farrow getting divorced from Frank Sinatra at the time) who move into a new apartment to start their lives together. After a visit  from their kooky next-door neighbors (Sidney Blackmer and Oscar-winning cutie patootie Ruth Gordon) Guy's acting career takes off, and Rosemary gets a bun in her oven.
The American dream sours, however, when Rosemary sickens and suspects that there's something not right with the bundle of joy growing inside her. Add to that she fears her neighbors are more than just herbal supplement enthusiasts. And why is Guy always defending them? Are they in cahoots?

As with Repulsion, Rosemary focuses on the question of sanity. Are Rosemary's wild suspicions about Satan worshipers and visions of being raped by the Devil real, or is she losing her mind?
The questions of sanity go from affecting a single woman as the target of men's advances (poor Carol's dilemma) to a young wife bearing the burdens of motherhood both physical and social. Polanski's surreal shooting and editing styles create absorbing, visual madness, making us doubt Rosemary and what we ourselves have seen.

Here too, the apartment is a centerpiece for depicting this internal conflict. The apartment is isolated by the dark, decrepit hallway, and Rosemary hears strange, unintelligible whispering from the other side of her bedroom wall. It's as if the apartment is set aside from reality. Rosemary has to try and discern what's going on outside the walls of her own perception.

In the end, Rosemary discovers the truth by finding a secret passageway that leads her from what she thinks she knows in her apartment to the secrets enshrined in the world next door.

Rosemary was a huge hit and made Polanski a hot director in Hollywood. But a year later, he would experience his own real-life horror movie when his wife and unborn child were murdered by the Manson Clan in their home. (I guess it's hard to avoid Polanski's f-ed up personal life.)


In 1976 after getting an Oscar nom for Chinatown (1974), Polanski returned to the theme of apartment insanity with The Tenant. In this film Polanski cast himself as Trelkovsky, a man who snags an apartment in Paris because the former occupant, Simone, jumped out the window. Feeling guilty for getting an apartment because of someone else's misfortune, Trelkovsky visits Simone in the hospital, only to find her encased in a body cast unable to speak.
She lets out a big scream and croaks, though, when Stella (Isabelle Adjani) arrives. This doesn't prevent Trelkovsky and Stella from going to the movies and fondling each other.
Trelkovsky's stroke of real estate luck goes south as his neighbors and the concierge (the eternal Shelley Winters) begin to nag him about the noise from his apartment. He begins watching his neighbors through windows- seeing their forms and their shadows- a voyeur of the outside world instead of a part of it.

He is absorbed in the grungy apartment, finding a hole in the wall that contains a tooth, and Simone's dress stuffed in a cupboard. Paranoia morphs into personality incoherence as Trelkovsky begins to believe he is Simone- dressing up like a woman; gushing over shoes and realizing, "I think I'm pregnant,"; and finally jumping from his window mimicking Simone's fate.

The film's spiral into weirdness is only heightened by the fact that Polanski is the main character. He is the director of two previous films about women going insane who then directs himself as a man who turns into a woman who goes insane. The final scene with all of the neighbors watching his meltdown as if he is on a stage leaves us with the feeling that Polanski was struggling with the very public exposure of his work and tragic private life.

His life had become a must-watch horror movie, so he blurred the lines between his life and his art- by literally inserting himself  into the surreal visions that he had depicted in his earlier films. It's one of the strangest descents into madness by a character (and perhaps a director) in film.